Jeff Kell <jeff-k...@utc.edu> wrote: > > On 1/11/2011 11:29 AM, Seth Mattinen wrote: >> The cisco-nsp mailing list is often much more helpful than TAC. > > On that note... does this ring any bells? > > Have a 3750E that has had spurious reloads (4 since Friday), was > switch-1 of a 3-member stack, initially was the master, now switch-2 has > taken over as master. Show version on the failing one just shows > >> FunnyFarm-1 uptime is 17 hours, 48 minutes >> System returned to ROM by power-on > > The other members have 23-week uptimes. > > There's no crashinfo in the logs, no "software forced reload" type > reload events. > > TAC insists power was cut to the switch (four times?). > Weekly at roughly 4:30am we regularly saw power cycling of a bunch of kit (including a 3750E stack) reoccurring, often to the minute, for one[1] of our "considerably less than average" server rooms.
We put it down to brown-out's on a circuit caused by a timer asking for hell to be stoked so that the building has a chance to warm up. Simple text is to slap something else on the same circuit and see if that loses power too...make sure it is picky about getting it's $LOCAL_VOLTAGE and $WANTED_AMPERAGE (or put the stack member on a portable UPS). If that dies, you know your power feed is dodgy, if it stays up, you might have a borked/loose/taught cable. Cheers [1] that's a lie, they all are "considerably less than average" -- Alexander Clouter .sigmonster says: Do not drink and drive. _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/