On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 1:42 AM, Peter Rathlev <[email protected]> wrote:
> We always use LACP, since an unconditional port-channel connected to > something that's not a port-channel might lead to problems. I view it a > little like GE auto-negotiation -- I can't see a reason for not using > it. > > Actually, one reason for _not_ using LACP if you have 6500-VSSes. You may end up with traffic traversing the VSL connections which could otherwise be avoided. Regards Andrew _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
