-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 All:
Any caveats with using the same route-map for v4 and v6 BGP peering sessions? What about statements with match statements that match either v4 and v6? e.g. route-map foo permit 10 match ip next-hop foo match ipv6 next-hop bar Would that match v4 or v6, depending on the address type? - -- Devon -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk1MJMkACgkQWP2WrBTHBS8nJgCbBw2HrM7PVDYrqcOALdWi+cnb K54Aniwtnl1jTfTpGXLvY8Yeidhv1osH =f1Zw -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
