When you consider the age of the 65xx platform it's pretty remarkable how they have held up.
On Mar 21, 2011, at 2:55 PM, Nick Hilliard wrote: > On 21/03/2011 21:41, Greg Whynott wrote: >> just my opinion, i may be way off base. > > no, not at all - it's not surprising that something with a chipset from 2 > years ago will spank it. The 6500 is a great GE aggregator switch, but > only a mediocre 10G platform. Retro-fitting high density 10G on a > backplane dating from the early 2000s is not really a viable option if you > actually need to push lots of data through it, so it's not surprising that > it's no good for HPC. > > If you can live within their limitations, the current generation of 10G > top-of-rack switches provide ridiculously good value. > > Nick > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/