On Sat, 26 Mar 2011, Jeff Kell wrote:
I had a 6509/Sup2 (clearly can't do full tables) for some time, using
various route-maps and filtering tricks to keep the IPv4 routes under
128K (which seems to be the magic number with uRPF enabled). If that is
exceeded, it generates TCAM overflow errors and essentially the 6500 is
bricked relative to passing traffic. Under 128K and it's fine.
I intended to upgrade this to "something" suitable for full routing
tables, and went for a Sup720/PFC3CXL. A million routes, right?
Not really. The million routes thing is highly misleading.
Received another WS-X6516-GBIC but with a DFC3A. Powers up, but
switches everything to "PFC3A" mode:
If you're not doing that much traffic, is removing the DFC from the
WS-X6516-GBIC an option?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Jon Lewis, MCP :) | I route
Senior Network Engineer | therefore you are
Atlantic Net |
_________ http://www.lewis.org/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key_________
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
