On Mon, 28 Mar 2011 13:09:56 -0700, you wrote: >> If it really is only two boxes, FabricPath provides *no* benefits,
> For one thing you could provide up to 256 10G links between two > boxes, something you could not do with STP. OK, 256 x 10G is cool and much more than you can do with link aggregation. But for *two* boxes? >> only more complexity... > FP config is certainly no more complex than STP. What makes you think > it's complex? Have you ever configured it? I didn't say it was complex to configure. But I'm sure you'll agree that the technology is more complex than an aggregated link? I was just saying if you only have two boxes (what the OP said), use link aggregation and be done with it. -A _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/