I agree. It's just that I have an identical router that's set up identically with slightly lower ingress but higher total ingress + egress numbers, and can go over 40%.
Frank -----Original Message----- From: Asbjorn Hojmark - Lists [mailto:li...@hojmark.org] Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2011 3:01 AM To: frnk...@iname.com Cc: Cisco NSP Subject: Re: [c-nsp] 3845 maxing out at 400 Mbps On Mon, 28 Mar 2011 21:14:21 -0500, you wrote: > The ACLs are BCP 38-oriented with eBGP; no rate-limiting. We're running > 124-11.XW2. You really should look at upgrading that to some more recent and less End-of-X. 12.4 XW also has know vulnerabilities only fixed in later releases. > Any ideas? The numbers are well below Cisco's router spec sheet. Actually, the 3800 is positioned for T3/E3 speeds... I consider it quite impressive that you're pushing up to 400 Mbps though them with some features. The spec sheet is best case numbers with no features. *Any* feature that you turn on will negatively affect performance, and the actual performance hit for each feature will also vary with traffic patterns. -A _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
