CSCsw63003 is indeed not fixed in SXJ yet, however it's fixed in SXI6.

Andras


On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 3:55 PM, Jared Mauch <ja...@puck.nether.net> wrote:
>
> On May 3, 2011, at 9:21 AM, Brandon Ewing wrote:
>
>> On Tue, May 03, 2011 at 08:48:23AM -0400, Jared Mauch wrote:
>>> There is a memory leak that is not fixed if you run BGP.
>>>
>>> Jared Mauch
>>>
>>
>> Is this the same one that was present earlier in the SXI releases, where a
>> neighbor in Idle or Active states leaks memory?  I thought they had that
>> fixed around SXI4 or SXI5
>
> CSCsw63003
>
> Routing
>
> Continous BGP activity may result in increasing amounts of memory held
>
> Symptoms:
> Memory increase occurs in 'BGP Router' process due to BGP path attributes. 
> Memory used by this process increases constantly and so do the BGP path 
> attributes while the number of routes does not increase.
>
> Not sure why they don't call this a "leak" but apparently they have a 
> different way to describe it.
>
> Basically, if you use BGP, don't use SXJ as it will leak itself to death over 
> a period of time, possibly as short as 4 weeks with full routes.
>
> - Jared
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>

_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Reply via email to