-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Joseph Hardeman wrote: > Hi Everyone, > > I am hoping that someone can give me some guidance with how to setup > VRF-Lite and routing with BGP and intra-vrf routing. I have been playing > with this for about a week now and figured out how to setup vrf-lite to a > certain point. I know if I apply the ip vrf xx to an interface such as > physical, loopback, or vlan I can pass traffic up or down it on the same > vrf, including if I set the vrf on an interface going outbound to a BGP > peering neighbor I can pull in their bgp announcements to that vrf, but what > I am having problems with is can this be done via the Global BGP routing > table? Or can I somehow do a Global Leak so that the VRF can communicate > out of its area to the remote peer? > > I hope I am clear here, if not I will be happy to share my testing > configuration. Basically we are wanting to separate 2 networks so that they > have their own BGP Routing tables so they have different routes out but at > the same time be able to communicate between all of the local networks the > router has installed on it. >
Leaking between VRFs is done via import/export statements indicating which route targets are put into the global VPNv4 table and which should be brought into a particular VRF. Leaking routes between into/out of the global routing table is typically accomplished via static routes. There are examples of both types of leaking here http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk436/tk832/technologies_configuration_example09186a0080231a3e.shtml - -- ========= bep -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk4uUQUACgkQE1XcgMgrtya7WwCg/oSEzUQndQTjcBSb0mrijOEj MOoAni2RS1Xv0NdBG26Z3qMpLgiH+7Eu =IlzE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
