On Friday, August 12, 2011 12:48:14 AM Keegan Holley wrote: > I think your original question was about carrier ethernet > gear. I have also had some bad experiences with > foundry/brocade equipment. Cisco's metro-e offering > leaves something to be desired as well though. I > actually went with ciena switches and mac-in-mac or PBB > encapsulation. It's much more robust than vpls/L2vpn > (at least until T-MPLS is standardized) and is simpler > to implement and supported on lower cost gear. Most use > vpls or l2vpn in their core to make use of existing > routers.
We've just gone ahead and deployed IP/MPLS in the Access. Much simpler (for us) than the other bridging technologies. Mark.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
