We're looking to move to SXJ1, principally to support the ES+ line cards on 6500s. IPv4 (+multicast), IPv6, BGP.
Anybody know of any issues with this? Andy B. -----Original Message----- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Howard Leadmon Sent: 24 August 2011 04:50 To: 'Phil Mayers'; 'ML'; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] SXJ - The good, the bad, the ugly? Running SXJ1 here as well, and knock on wood, so far, so good.. IPv4, IPv6, and BGP all currently in use.. --- Howard Leadmon -----Original Message----- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Phil Mayers Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2011 1:01 PM To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] SXJ - The good, the bad, the ugly? On 08/22/2011 11:49 AM, chiel wrote: > I see that there is a SXJ1 available, is anybody running this version > successfully in production (with BGP and IPv6)? Or should i stick to > SXI7 for now? We've moved to SXJ1. It seems a solid release. _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
