Ask and you shall receive.
Hint.... On Sep 29, 2011 3:41 PM, "Tim Durack" <[email protected]> wrote: > We are currently using the C6K in this role. The N7K is looking like > the logical replacement. > > If Cisco produced a 10/100/1000/PoE FEX, and upgraded the N7K to > support 100s of FEX on a chassis pair, we could replace the entire > access layer with N7K plus FEX remote linecards. Now that would be > cool... > > Tim:> > > On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 12:47 PM, Phil Mayers <[email protected]> wrote: >> I'm curious if anyone has any thoughts on this platform as an MPLS P/PE >> router. >> >> It probably seems odd, and that an ASR9k might be a more obvious choice, but >> for an enterprise MPLS core router it has a few nice properties - lots of >> 10gig, goes fast, decent OS and commonality of sparing and parts with the >> datacentre (if you use them there). >> >> I'm assuming an ASR9k is a lot more expensive than an N7k? >> >> Why *wouldn't* you buy an N7k in this role? >> >> Just pondering... >> >> Cheers, >> Phil >> _______________________________________________ >> cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp >> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ >> > > > > -- > Tim:> > > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
