you can't aggregate those two /30 into a single /29. /29 subnets are increments of 8 eg 216.24.2.0/29, 216.24.2.8/29. Write it out in binary and look at the most significant bits in each.
Sent from my iPad On 07/10/2011, at 6:22 AM, "Joseph Mays" <[email protected]> wrote: > It feels strange to be asking a question about something as simple as a > subnet here, but I'm honestly not sure what's going on in this case. Probably > something simple. > > As you can see from the following set of commands, the router is fine with > breaking the following addresses up into /30's, but not fine with the > aggregate of the two routes into a /29. > > gw1.armplc(config)#ip route 216.24.2.4 255.255.255.252 216.24.0.54 > gw1.armplc(config)#no ip route 216.24.2.4 255.255.255.252 216.24.0.54 > gw1.armplc(config)#ip route 216.24.2.8 255.255.255.252 216.24.0.54 > gw1.armplc(config)#no ip route 216.24.2.8 255.255.255.252 216.24.0.54 > gw1.armplc(config)#ip route 216.24.2.4 255.255.255.248 216.24.0.54 > %Inconsistent address and mask > > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
