On 10/13/11 10:24 AM, Phil Mayers wrote:
On 13/10/11 16:03, Tim Durack wrote:
Next best idea is to migrate the 1Gig port-channel to Po2, and create a new Po1 with 10Gig links (I would like to maintain Po1 as the pop backbone.)
Use this opportunity to determine the STP impact. Move links one at a time, and see how much impact you have.
I would just do this, then let STP choose the higher bandwidth link.
I'd also suggest 'spann pathcost method long' to have better granularity on your link costs.
pt _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
