On Wednesday, November 23, 2011 11:50:39 AM Jeff Bacon wrote: > That might be an ideal end-game. I still need to finish > flushing out EIGRP, though, and it's a > continuously-in-flux network - we keep adding sites and > kit and vendor connections seemingly as fast as we have > time to string it all up.
Since you're migrating to from EIGRP to OSPF, as an option, have you considered IS-IS as well? It certainly doesn't suffer from the "all Areas must connect to the Backbone Area" problem, so you can string the network along as wide as you want without worrying about "breaking it up". Of course, always go with what you're more familiar/comfortable with. On our end, we chose IS-IS primarily for this very reason. But I understand that it may not be for you. Cheers, Mark.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
