Sure, REP was developed in a way to block BPDU messages on the REP ports. But my concern was the number of vlans that can be blocked using REP, cause I used PVST and it only supports 128 vlans thats is why I am thinking of using REP .
Does REP have a limitation on the number of supported vlans ? On Nov 28, 2011, at 7:14 PM, Łukasz Bromirski <luk...@bromirski.net> wrote: > On 2011-11-28 17:55, Michael K. Smith - Adhost wrote: >> Hello: >> >> The one limitation of REP is no spanning tree. > > Well, isn't it obvious, as REP was developed to eliminate > need for STP? > > REP can perfectly interwork with STP at the edges. > > -- > "There's no sense in being precise when | Łukasz Bromirski > you don't know what you're talking | jid:lbromir...@jabber.org > about." John von Neumann | http://lukasz.bromirski.net > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/