That came in 15.0(4)M iirc, called 'right-to-use' license and basically reverts to the old licensing model. The juggling with PAKs was a nightmare.
On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 11:19 PM, Per Carlson <pe...@hemmop.com> wrote: >> You need 'data' license for MPLS. You should have trial option if that's >> newly shipped 3900, as it's now shipped with grace period of 600+ weeks. > > 600+ *weeks*!? A 10 year trial period is nice :-) If that's the > default, I might be less negative about the licensing system. > > -- > Pelle > > RFC1925, truth 11: > Every old idea will be proposed again with a different name and > a different presentation, regardless of whether it works. > > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
