Inside of Cisco brand maybe not. Outside of Cisco definitely possible. On Jan 21, 2012 5:02 PM, "chris stand" <cstand...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > (... and this is reason #1 why we are not using VSS) > > > > gert > > -- > > USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW! > > We have two data centers, one with VSS one with 2 * 7Ks. > Both DC have 5548s and UCS chassis with L2 extended between both. > I can create a 40Gb or 80Gb port channel from the VSS to both 5Ks and > UCS and run L2 & L3 over it. > > Can't do that with 7Ks or anything else I can think of. > > Got another 2 chassis solution for redundancy / performance that can > do that OTHER than VSS ? > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/