On 24 Jan 2012, at 17:06, Nick Hilliard wrote:

> Bird is extremely cool, no doubt about it.  I use it for route servers at
> INEX and it is rock solid with lots of yummy features, including a
> delicious configuration syntax.  Internally, it has a much better memory
> architecture / implementation than openbgpd, which in turn has a much
> better memory architecture/implementation than quagga.  However, IOS-XE has
> a commanding lead in this area: it scales to far bigger systems for route
> servers than bird (or openbgpd / quagga).

The last time I looked, quaaga and IOS-XE support unicast and multicast SAFI; 
bird and OpenBGPD only unicast.  While bird and OpenBGPD can be "fixed", not 
having to do so is a plus.  The query is driven by the 2 GiB quagga bgpd 
processes we're currently seeing.

Michael


_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Reply via email to