Remember that pref is non transitive. If you could, could you do a show ip bgp prefix and paste the output?
Then we might be able to expand more. Thanks On Jan 31, 2012, at 3:42 PM, John Brown wrote: > Hi, > I'm suffering from driving spreadsheets instead of routers. > > Have a customer that has two routers. > > A and B > > A is connected to us > B is connected to two other eBGP neighbors (transit providers) > > A and B are connected via iBGP. > > A == 7300 widget > B === 9000 widget > > Traffic via our link is nearly 100 percent ingress to their router A. > Very little egress from A. > > A is basically a router that feeds the link to us. > > B is their main "core" router. > > Looking at the routes in B, it shows that they are pref'n routes via B's > transit providers, instead of via our link through A. > > Yet the AS path is much shorter via A to us. > > The same route via B is 5 AS's (no padded) and the route via A is 2 AS's > > In looking at the route selection priorities, Local-Pref and then AS path > should cause our routes to win well before the iBGP / eBGP selection rule(S) > > Not sure what I'm missing here. I know its gotta be dumb and in another life > I would know the answer. > > Thoughts oh wise list ?? > > Mucho thanks. > > > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/