We recently found out from Cisco that the plain-old 6509 is not smartnet-able anymore. Might be something you want to consider.
-----Original Message----- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Bill Wade Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2012 9:39 AM To: Phil Mayers; cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Quick 6500 question... Also the 6513E backplane provides 80Gb (dual fabric channels) for each slot whereas the 6513 is limited to 40Gb in slots 1-8. ________________________________ From: Phil Mayers <p.may...@imperial.ac.uk> To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Sent: Tuesday, February 7, 2012 12:19 PM Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Quick 6500 question... On 07/02/12 15:30, Justin M. Streiner wrote: > On Tue, 7 Feb 2012, Jeff Kell wrote: > >> Quick reality check... >> >> Is the difference in the E-series chassis only in available power? >> Has nothing to do with backplane bandwidth? > > The non-E chassis only has 40G per slot to the backplane, where the E > chassis has 80G per slot. IIRC the Sup2T and 6900-series blades will > only work in an E chassis. I don't have any Sup2Ts or 6900s to verify that. This is correct. _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/