Thanks all for the advice. I figured out with TAC. The label is filtered by my label advertisement filter.
Schilling On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 12:49 PM, Saku Ytti <s...@ytti.fi> wrote: > On (2012-03-27 14:00 -0400), schilling wrote: > >> I am trying to have catalyst 6500 w/ sup720 3BXL with 12.2(33)SXI5 to >> support ASBR exchanging VPN-IPv4, but 6500 is not allocating labels >> for prefixes learned from eBGP over address family vpnv4. >> >> Does anybody ever have this working? Any catch? > > Should work. Are you sure you were actually sending labels? 'send-label' in > route-map? Also did you enable MPLS forwarding in interface via 'mpls bgp > forwarding' > > In my opinion OptionB is useless, you need OptionA if full trust lacks, and > otherwise OptC will be more convenient or just native MPLS. > RFC4364 page 32 last sentence mandates that OptB should do RPF like label > checking. This would guarantee that you only put shared customers at risk, > but as this checking is non-existing in every vendor (IOS XR supposedly is > getting it), it removes the usage case. > > -- > ++ytti > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/