On (2012-05-20 21:35 -0500), Tony Varriale wrote: > >Maybe your set of features configured in your 3750 in your IOS release is > >better match. It would be arrogant to assume that non of our problems were > >caused by operator mistakes, I'm sure some field-techs have done it wrong. > > Arrogant of you? Or me? I wasn't implying anything. I was giving > you an opinion and my experience with 3750s.
'of our problems'. Would be arrogant of us to claim, that none of the problem were caused by operator :) > Do you have NOS service? Or, do you/your team do bug scrubs? How > about any type of testing prior to going into production? Yes, we do test all images prior to production. If testing was easy, vendors wouldn't ship buggy software. I'd be surprised if there was any non-trivial deployment of stacked and non-stacked switched from any vendor, where stacked had same or less problems than non-stacked. Many people might find that both have sufficiently low number of problems. -- ++ytti _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/