On 23/05/12 12:16, Mark Tinka wrote:
On Wednesday, May 23, 2012 01:00:47 PM Phil Mayers wrote:
You're probably right, but the N7k is quite close in
parity to the 6500, in L3VPN-land. L2VPN (I am told)
should similarly be more or less equivalent to sup2T.
They're a surprisingly respectable box, and modulo
"business unit focus" concerns, it's looking difficult
to justify a Sup2T...
I'm thinking all those other non-MPLS features, e.g., QoS,
routing, EVC, e.t.c.
My experience has been that the entire box, pretty much all features,
are "on a par" with 6500, including QoS and routing. The only
significant things I can think that are missing are L2VPN, service
modules and non-IP routing.
Of course your original message was ASR versus Nexus, and you're
doubtless correct that the ASR leads in every respect; but the 6500
versus Nexus is, in my opinion, a much closer run thing.
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
