On Friday, June 08, 2012 07:42:55 PM Phil Bedard wrote: > Coming from a large provider with a BGP and LDP free > core, and utilizing TE, we much prefer the BGP signaled > method with P2MP RSVP-TE than native PIM or even using > MLDP. Providers have been asking Cisco for this stuff > for a long time now. IOS-XR has MVPN with static routed > P2MP RSVP-TE in 4.2.1, I doubt NG-MVPN is far behind > although they will be kicking and screaming the whole > way.
Coming to IOS XR Q1'13, and on the roadmap for IOS XE. Cisco really have no choice here. We've dropped several ASR9000's from the proposal list simply because of lack of this, which is what happened when customers were looking for VPLS back then. > The Cisco methodology of using the mdt-safi is completely > outdated at this point and if you are already using BGP > to signal this why not use it to signal customer state > instead of having a secondary complicated method to do > so... Agree. Mark.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
