Well, ASR1K can do MPLSoGREoIPSec

Encryption is done in HW on a dedicated resource, so it does not impact 
performance (but has its own capacity per ESP module type, which is way above 
1Gbps on any of the models)

The QOS marking would be based on precedence (only 3 bits), as the original IP 
DSCP is applied to the 3 MPLS EXP bits, and then copied to the external IP 
header...

Arie


-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Andrew Miehs
Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2012 04:36
To: Gert Doering
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] MPLS over GRE/IPSEC



Sent from a mobile device

On 08/08/2012, at 21:11, Gert Doering <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 01:50:21PM +0300, Aivars wrote:
>> Alright, sorry. Missed the part about 1G. In that case I agree, that 
>> the smallest ASR1k will be needed.
> 
> Can the ASR1k *do* this, as in "it is implemented, officially 
> supported, and documented to work"?

I have had an ASR1001 running mpls over gre working. It wasn't encrypted 
however - and at the time we were only pushing about 50mbits per sec without an 
issue. On a new site I would probably do this with sup2t in the 6500s.

Will ask at my old company how tge ASRs are doing....

Andrew



_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  [email protected] 
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Reply via email to