On Oct 16, 2012, at 10:49 PM, CiscoNSP_list CiscoNSP_list wrote:
> Hi Guys,
>
> Currently have a 7200 NPE-G2 taking a full bgp table - Looking at getting
> another upstream, and also taking a full table from them....The NPE-G2 should
> handle this ok?
Does this help?
l3-router#sh mem sum
Head Total(b) Used(b) Free(b) Lowest(b) Largest(b)
Processor 6B934E0 1883685636 357038688 1526646948 1519396896
1514586884
I/O 78000000 67108864 8818592 58290272 58056480 58228700
Transient 77000000 16777216 141092 16636124 13631488 16586364
Neighbor V AS MsgRcvd MsgSent TblVer InQ OutQ Up/Down
State/PfxRcd
x.x.x.x 4 yyyy 16718073 515900 20355657 0 0 4w6d 79513
x.x.x.x 4 yyyy 11846634 99091 20355657 0 0 9w6d 159199
x.x.x.x 4 yyyy 13888256 516045 20355657 0 0 9w6d 159199
I'm filtering some stuff, but my understanding is that even without the routes
installed they do consume memory.
I can see a CPU hit at times from the BGP process if something flaps, but it's
not an OMGWTFBBQ sort of spike...
Charles
>
> Cheers
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
