On (2012-10-18 14:57 +0200), Benny Amorsen wrote: > You must be usÃng the interface addresses for the BGP peering endpoints, > since you would need an IGP to reach any loopbacks, and we are trying to > avoid running an IGP? I cannot get away with using the same BGP neighbor > address for all CE's.
Yes, you'd need to manually configure the PE interface as neighbour in every CE. I personally don't worry much about CE config/complexity, partly because I don't much deal with them, partly because the config is manageable anyhow as it's one customer. But I can understand it can be problem in some environments where with IGP you can live with standard config. I guess vendor could implement this by allowing DHCP default-gw to be configured as BGP peer. Now you just need to be buying devices for half a million USD to get PERS/ER done :) -- ++ytti _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
