On 26/11/12 12:23, Daniel Roesen wrote:
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 01:02:58AM +0100, Peter Rathlev wrote:
And if we end up modifying the RFP to make the basic IPv6 support
optional we have hopefully at least sent a signal.
Yes. The signal is "ignore mandatory IPv6 requirements - they will get
dropped to optional anyway" - which is the partyline I hear from
multiple vendors about IPv6 requirements in RFPs. They are very relaxed
about those, and it shows unfortunately.
Ok. What's your suggestion then?
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
