Hi, On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 11:27:08PM +1100, Reuben Farrelly wrote: > What vendors, other than Cisco, support some form of Rapid-PVST? I
Juniper does, both on MX "not-so-switches" and on EX.
> believe Arista do on their switches - are there any others? If it's
> proprietary, did Arista license it from Cisco or...? It seems so
> patently obvious that PVST would be a smart idea, yet so few vendors
> seem to support it. What gives?
"If we do not implement it but bash Cisco for being non-standard instead,
we save money in R&D and can make it look like it's all Cisco's fault!"
It *is* blatantly obvious and logical, but "there is no standard document
that says you should it do that way".
gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
//www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany g...@greenie.muc.de
fax: +49-89-35655025 g...@net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
pgpFfPHblUYni.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
