> For reference, I have been saying exactly what everyone here has been > saying, but my boss wants the specifics :-)
How about www.cisco.com/go/fn That is the feature navigator. Other than that, I think you'd have to find some CiscoLive presentations. > > > > Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2013 15:28:55 -0500 > Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Cat 6500 vs ASR > From: [email protected] > To: [email protected] > CC: [email protected]; [email protected] > > I think the problem is that the devil is in the details. > > Both boxes will support most of the same features (VPLS, NAT, Netflow, > QoS). For every feature listed here there are caveats that need to be kept in > mind when comparing the boxes (ex. for NAT 6k punts the first packet to > built state, ASR1k doesn't. ASR1k will scale to larger NAT table sizes). > > > -Pete > > > On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 2:44 PM, Mark John <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > Dear oh dear! > > > > Yes, admittedly two very different platforms with different core purposes, > but in term of support for logical features which can be compared side-by- > side, that's not too difficult if you the info. Some gave an example earlier of > support for VPLS, but never mind :-) > > > > > > > > > > > > Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2013 12:41:40 +0000 > > > From: [email protected] > > > To: [email protected] > > > CC: [email protected] > > > Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Cat 6500 vs ASR > > > > > > On 17/01/2013 11:56, Mark John wrote: > > > > True. So, ASR 1xxx > > > > > > "Compare two completely different things. Be specific." > > > > > > Oh my. > > > > > > Nick > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > > > > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > > -- > This message has been scanned for viruses and > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is > believed to be clean. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
