Hi, On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 08:52:33PM -0500, Jeff Kell wrote: > Known bug? Feature? You can alter a port-channel configuration and > expect it to propagate to the members, correct?
I'd share that assumption. If you alter the port-channel config and the
members fall out of sync, it's a catastrophic bug.
(I haven't seen this myself yet, as most of our "many vlans, many changes"
port-channels are on 6500s that are quite well-behaved :-) - and on the
smaller switches, usually the set of VLANs is fairly static)
gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
//www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany g...@greenie.muc.de
fax: +49-89-35655025 g...@net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
pgpSQAdgZYyOs.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
