There is a problem with some dell machines and 4500s - this may be the same 
issue. Try turning off PoE on the port of use the latest firmware on the dell.


Sent from a mobile device

On 25/01/2013, at 5:01, <vinny_abe...@dell.com> wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> I've been having a reproducible problem across multiple Catalyst 6509 
> switches running the same IOS 12.2(33)SXI4a for a while now that I just can't 
> nail down.
> 
> In many situations where the switch is configured with an SVI on VLAN to 
> function as a gateway, very often I find that I am unable to communicate with 
> a newly added device or assigned IP on an existing device on that VLAN. No 
> amount of probing it will appear to get it to respond. However, if I am on 
> the device itself where the IP is bound and just do a simple ping out to 
> something which has to traverse the SVI IP as a gateway, as long as the 
> origin of the packet is the same IP, the switch then seems to learn the MAC 
> address properly and all is happy and continues to work from that point 
> forward.
> 
> Is there something that would prevent ARP from discovering these newly added 
> devices when the switch would be soliciting the network segment for the MAC 
> address for a certain IP? I was leaning towards bug... or I have some 
> unintended consequence due to the CoPP policy or rate-limiters on these 
> switches which are also the same.
> 
> I have the following mls rate limiters defined:
> 
> mls rate-limit multicast ipv4 ip-options 100 10
> mls rate-limit unicast ip options 100 10
> mls rate-limit unicast ip icmp redirect 100 10
> mls rate-limit all ttl-failure 100 10
> mls rate-limit all mtu-failure 100 10
> 
> I have policing on arp packets in CoPP (which I think if I remember is done 
> in software anyway), but I recall completely removing this and still having 
> the same issue.
> 
> For reference, I'm doing in CoPP:
> 
> class-map match-all CoPP_ARP
>  match protocol arp
> 
> policy-map CoPP
> ...
>  class CoPP_ARP
>   police 8000000
>  ...
> 
> Thanks for any assistance or advice!
> 
> -Vinny
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Reply via email to