On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 11:27:23AM +0100, Benny Amorsen wrote: > Scott Lambert <[email protected]> writes: > > > It turns out that the telco is going to give the DSL to us via QinQ > > rather than L2TP as I had assumed. I've been reading up on that > > and it doesn't look too bad. I have not figured out the shaping > > of the individual client connections, yet. Some more reading will > > likely fill in the gap between ubr and whatever is needed with PPPoE > > over QinQ. > > Do you need PPPoE at all? You can probably identify the client by the > combination of VLANs alone.
I could. But doing away with PPPoE would mean reconfiguring every client's DSL modem or whatever consumer router they have, if I'm not mistaken. That would be a very big headache. -- Scott Lambert KC5MLE Unix SysAdmin [email protected] _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
