> -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:cisco-nsp- > [email protected]] On Behalf Of Chris Evans > Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2013 1:19 PM > To: Adam Vitkovsky > Cc: cisco-nsp > Subject: Re: [c-nsp] End to end keepalive over QinQ provider > > I have two paths that I'd like to port-channel. Since they don't support > LACP the only thing I can do is do static configuration, but if the path > of > one of the links takes a hit there is no end to end notifications that > will > cause an interface to go down or be taken out of forwarding. With LACP > you > can do this because the ports will debundle. I was hoping that CFM would > take the path out of service, but I don't think that is the case. > > Thoughts?
You mean the LACP negotiation is eaten by your provider? What kind of strange equipment/config are they running? UDLD is designed to do what you want - will that function? Cheers Ross _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
