On Wed, 20 Feb 2013, Jon Lewis wrote:
The Sup720 can do 1 million routes too. Can you point out where cisco says the implementation is any different between the Sup720, RSP720, and Sup2T that makes the latter capable of handling more v4/v6 routes than the former. Everything I've seen says the FIB TCAM space has not been improved.
I saw an output someone pasted to me from a Sup2T indicating it would take 1M IPv4 routes and 0.5M IPv6 routes (at the same time). I don't have access to one myself so I can't verify.
The major issue with Sup720 is that it's slow and I've seen them fall over and start losing other adjacancies when there was a lot of BGP work.
-- Mikael Abrahamsson email: [email protected] _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
