That is why I addressed Oliver directly. I had a discussion with him at Cisco Live and this came up.
The idea is too use MPLS/BGP for transport/signaling. So, no PIM on core/dist links. Only toward Customers and Peers. I do'nt have the details as we have not yet looked into implementing but, as Gert pointed out, we some times experience the same issue. That PIM is forgotten because it is the odd protocol that no one uses except on the node that your doing disaster recovery on. So, where as always looking for the "Keep it simple, stupid" version. On 6 March 2013 09:26, Mikael Abrahamsson <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, 6 Mar 2013, Mattias Gyllenvarg wrote: > > I was just refering too removing PIM from within Core/Dist not inter-AS. >> > > How is multicast supposed to work at all whereever for L3 routing without > PIM? > > I'll admit I'm a bit rusty and only know about PIM-SM and PIM-SSM, what > other methods are there for controlling routed multicast? > > > -- > Mikael Abrahamsson email: [email protected] > -- *Med Vänliga Hälsningar - Best Regards* *Mattias Gyllenvarg* *Nätutveckling* Bredband2 Tel: +46 406219712 _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
