On 17/03/2013, at 11:23 AM, Jeff Kell <jeff-k...@utc.edu> wrote: > We had been doing PAgP on Cisco-to-Cisco, but leaning toward LACP today > for anything that supports it.
In our VSS clusters (Sup2T), we're using PAgP where possible, and LACP to everything else. PAgP offers dual-active detection for VSS that LACP can't. Yes, I'd love to have one protocol that worked for everything. No, its never going to happen. Rgds, - I. _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
