Hi Sander, It definitely works. A colleague of mine installed one two weeks ago.
I would recommend that you use both ports on the supervisor rather than on a line card for the VSL (Link). The 6908 should work for VSL, the 6704 won't - but it can be used for other traffic. Regards Andrew On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 7:43 AM, Sander Steffann <san...@steffann.nl> wrote: > Hi, > > We're trying to implement VPLS PE Redundancy with Supervisor Engine 2T > (VSS) as described in > http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/switches/ps5718/ps708/white_paper_c11-663645.html#wp9000139and > constantly failing. It seems so simple: set up a VSS, use LACP or PAgP > port-channels to the distribution switches and do VPLS on the VSS. It just > doesn't seem to work. Using WS-X6908-10G-2TXL line cards already gives less > problems than with WS-X6704-10GE line cards, but still it fails to work > very often. I sometimes wonder if I am going mad or if this setup has never > actually been tested... > > So: has anybody ever set up a network like this, or am I really beta > testing for Cisco now? > > Cheers, > Sander Steffann > > > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/