What Gert is trying to say is that you should not configure half-duplex, or disable CEF without very good reasons.
to your original question, bridging isn't a bad idea and can be accomplished with the use of bridge-groups. Just be aware of any limitations that your firewall may have with regards to how you connect/peer to your provider. On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 10:15 AM, Gert Doering <g...@greenie.muc.de> wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 09:11:37AM +0200, Eugene van der Merwe wrote: > > Is this a stupid idea? > > > > On the Cisco I have this configuration: > > > > interface FastEthernet0/0 > > ip address 196.x.x.x 255.255.255.0 > > no ip route-cache cef > > *this* is almost ever a stupid idea. > > > duplex half > > As is this. > > gert > -- > USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW! > // > www.muc.de/~gert/ > Gert Doering - Munich, Germany > g...@greenie.muc.de > fax: +49-89-35655025 > g...@net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de > > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/