It would be worth asking your colleague what wavelength or frequency "channel 35" is, and make sure your optics are tuned to that, rather than a "channel number" which can be anything from make to make of DWDM system.
On 3 April 2013 20:20, Aaron <aar...@gvtc.com> wrote: > Yes > > > > I'm feel like up'ing to sev2 and getting live hand-off > > > > the tac eng recommended trying a different port on asr9k. you think that's > what it is ? > > > > Aaron > > > > From: Aaron [mailto:dudep...@gmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2013 11:16 AM > To: Aaron > Cc: Mohacsi Janos; cisco-nsp > Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ipodwdm - asr 9000 > > > > Have you opened up a case with TAC? > > > > On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 10:59 AM, Aaron <aar...@gvtc.com> wrote: > > I tried, still same one-way arp. Also removed the dwdm equipment this > morning....now it's direct fiber and still same one-way arp seen.... > > Does this look weird that one says "10G-TUNABLE-by-WAVELENGTH" and the > other > one does not? > > > RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:9k-1#sh controller dwdm 0/0/0/0 | in Optics > Optics Type: 10G-TUNABLE-by-CHANNEL, 10G-TUNABLE-by-WAVELENGTH, > > RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:9k-2#sh controller dwdm 0/1/0/1 | in Optics > Optics Type: 10G-TUNABLE-by-CHANNEL, > > > > Also saw something in a cisco document that showed the "network port id" > number was different then the "network connection id" ...is it supposed to > be different ? > > > RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:9k-1#sh run controller dwdm 0/0/0/0 > controller dwdm0/0/0/0 > wavelength frequency 19350 > network connection id 0/0/0/0 > network port id 0/0/0/0 > admin-state in-service > > RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:9k-2#sh run controller dwdm 0/1/0/1 > controller dwdm0/1/0/1 > wavelength frequency 19350 > network connection id 0/1/0/1 > network port id 0/1/0/1 > admin-state in-service > > > Aaron > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Mohacsi Janos [mailto:moha...@niif.hu] > Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2013 4:20 AM > To: Aaron > Cc: 'Pshem Kowalczyk'; 'cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net' > Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ipodwdm - asr 9000 > > Hi Aaron, > Can you try configuring the DWDM channel with frequency, instead of > channel. We run into a similar problem a while ago. Solution was to > configure with frequency. > Best Regards, > > Janos Mohacsi > Head of HBONE+ project > Network Engineer, Director Network and Multimedia NIIF/HUNGARNET, HUNGARY > Co-chair of Hungarian IPv6 Forum Key 70EF9882: DEC2 C685 1ED4 C95A 145F > 4300 6F64 7B00 70EF 9882 > > On Tue, 2 Apr 2013, Aaron wrote: > > > Running ios xr 4.1.2 > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Pshem Kowalczyk [mailto:pshe...@gmail.com] > > Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2013 3:58 PM > > To: Aaron > > Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > > Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ipodwdm - asr 9000 > > > > If the filters only allow channel 35 that's what the optics should be > tuned to. I'm not sure how to verify that, since clearly you set the > channel > and yet the show commands do not confirm that. > > All that comes to mind is to confirm the actual frequencies of those > channels on the DWDM filters (we've encountered some incompatibilities with > Ericsson OTN equipment - their bands didn't always exactly aligned with ITU > channels). > > > > What software version are you running on those ASR9k? > > > > kind regards > > Pshem > > > > > > On 3 April 2013 09:50, Aaron <aar...@gvtc.com> wrote: > >> I just checked this with my collegue... > >> > >> The link from 9k to 9k passes through dwdm filters which filter on > >> channel 35 > >> > >> We pad that link and get around -12 to -15 > >> > >> What do you think about all this ? > >> > >> Aaron > >> > >> > >> > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Pshem Kowalczyk [mailto:pshe...@gmail.com] > >> Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2013 3:16 PM > >> To: Aaron > >> Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > >> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ipodwdm - asr 9000 > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> I'm not sure if this is relevant, but channel 53 is 194.55THz and > 1540.95nm (see here: > >> > > http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/modules/ps5455/data_sheet_78-4585 > < > http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/modules/ps5455/data_sheet_78-458 > 530.html> > 30.html). > >> > >> 193 THz is channel 22 and 1549.315nm is in fact channel 32. Output on > both routers shows the same values, so perhaps they do tune the optics the > same way. Is this a direct fibre, or does it go through some other > equipment? Also - what's the light budget of the link? > >> > >> kind regards > >> Pshem > >> > >> > >> On 3 April 2013 07:24, Aaron <aar...@gvtc.com> wrote: > >>> Opps, I added those dots "..." > >>> > >>> It looks like this... > >>> > >>> 9k-1 - > >>> > >>> > >>> Optics Status > >>> > >>> Optics Type: 10G-TUNABLE-by-CHANNEL, > >>> 10G-TUNABLE-by-WAVELENGTH, > >>> > >>> > >>> 9k-2 - > >>> > >>> > >>> Optics Status > >>> > >>> Optics Type: 10G-TUNABLE-by-CHANNEL, > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> -----Original Message----- > >>> From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net > >>> [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Aaron > >>> Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2013 1:12 PM > >>> To: 'Mikael Abrahamsson' > >>> Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > >>> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ipodwdm - asr 9000 > >>> > >>> Interesting, look what I just saw while comparing.... is this > significant? > >>> > >>> 9k-1... > >>> > >>> Optics Status > >>> > >>> Optics Type: 10G-TUNABLE-by-CHANNEL, > >>> 10G-TUNABLE-by-WAVELENGTH, ... > >>> > >>> 9k-2... > >>> > >>> Optics Status > >>> > >>> Optics Type: 10G-TUNABLE-by-CHANNEL, ... > >>> > >>> > >>> -----Original Message----- > >>> From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net > >>> [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Aaron > >>> Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2013 12:57 PM > >>> To: 'Mikael Abrahamsson' > >>> Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > >>> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ipodwdm - asr 9000 > >>> > >>> > >>> RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:9k-1#show controller dwdm 0/0/0/0 Tue Apr 2 > >>> 12:57:25.697 CDT > >>> > >>> Port dwdm0/0/0/0 > >>> > >>> Controller State: up > >>> > >>> Transport Admin State: In Service > >>> > >>> Loopback: None > >>> > >>> G709 Status > >>> > >>> G709 Disabled > >>> Connectivity Info > >>> > >>> Network Port ID: 0/0/0/0 > >>> Network Connection ID: 0/0/0/0 > >>> > >>> > >>> Optics Status > >>> > >>> Optics Type: 10G-TUNABLE-by-CHANNEL, > 10G-TUNABLE-by-WAVELENGTH, > >>> Wavelength Info: C-Band, MSA ITU Channel=53, > >>> Frequency=193.00THz, Wavelength=1549.315nm > >>> TX Power = 0.47 dBm > >>> RX Power = -16.81 dBm > >>> TDC Info > >>> > >>> TDC Not Supported on the Plim > >>> > >>> Network SRLG values: > >>> > >>> Not Configured > >>> > >>> RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:9k-1# > >>> > >>> ******************************************************************** > >>> * > >>> * > >>> ***** > >>> > >>> RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:9k-2#show controller dwdm 0/1/0/1 Tue Apr 2 > >>> 12:55:29.783 CDT > >>> > >>> Port dwdm0/1/0/1 > >>> > >>> Controller State: up > >>> > >>> Transport Admin State: In Service > >>> > >>> Loopback: None > >>> > >>> G709 Status > >>> > >>> G709 Disabled > >>> Connectivity Info > >>> > >>> Network Port ID: 0/1/0/1 > >>> Network Connection ID: 0/1/0/1 > >>> > >>> > >>> Optics Status > >>> > >>> Optics Type: 10G-TUNABLE-by-CHANNEL, > >>> Wavelength Info: C-Band, MSA ITU Channel=53, > >>> Frequency=193.00THz, Wavelength=1549.315nm > >>> TX Power = 0.41 dBm > >>> RX Power = -16.02 dBm > >>> TDC Info > >>> > >>> TDC Not Supported on the Plim > >>> > >>> Network SRLG values: > >>> > >>> Not Configured > >>> > >>> RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:9k-2# > >>> > >>> > >>> -----Original Message----- > >>> From: Mikael Abrahamsson [mailto:swm...@swm.pp.se] > >>> Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2013 11:38 AM > >>> To: Aaron > >>> Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > >>> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ipodwdm - asr 9000 > >>> > >>> On Tue, 2 Apr 2013, Aaron wrote: > >>> > >>>> Any assistance is appreciated > >>> > >>> "show controller dwdm 0/0/0/0" both ends. > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Mikael Abrahamsson email: swm...@swm.pp.se > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > >>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > >>> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > >>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > >>> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > >>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > >>> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > >> > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > > > > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > > > > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/