Hi, On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 04:20:44PM +0100, Nick Hilliard wrote: > On 29/03/2013 17:38, Gert Doering wrote: > > So that would also exclude Sup2T-based systems, using LAN cards > > (67/68/69xx)? > > James Rice found the following: http://goo.gl/xsP89 > > It's not completely clear what this means in practice, but the limitations > look peculiar. No IXP in the world uses DHCP or 802.1x, and I've not heard > of any which use IPSG.
And it very much sounds like "it will work for directly connected IP devices",
not for "routers".
Like in, quote: "The MAC address or physical port export data has a zero
value if the IP device tracking data does not include the data for the
specific IP address or VLAN being exported."
Yeah.
gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
//www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany [email protected]
fax: +49-89-35655025 [email protected]
pgp9NwDSRCqei.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
