So everyone waits and nobody reports a bug for the first 6 months? I summarily reject your irrational fears of "new" software. Software is imperfect in all cases.
I have specific defects that are keeping me from 4.3.1, these also exist in 4.2.3. Are you hitting the same bugs? I don't know. But rejecting something with loads of bug fixes and architecture changes to fix the whole every smu is a reload one because of a calendar without defects is irrational and illogical. Jared Mauch On May 23, 2013, at 7:35 AM, Mikael Abrahamsson <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, 23 May 2013, Jared Mauch wrote: > >> If 4.3.1 is too new to run why did they release it? I Love SE logic at times. >> >> Sounds like he just said Cisco will deliberately ship defective software. I >> would seek a new SE. > > Why would you want to replace an honest SE? > > "Everybody" knows you wait at least 6 month after major release if you want > stable software. > > -- > Mikael Abrahamsson email: [email protected] > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
