Thanks Tom for your kind email. I got your points. our customers will never accept any interruption !!! i can move some VLANs from 1st trunk to 2nd one, in this case should i care about loop ? i think it will not happen , each trunk will carry different VLANs and at swtich side configure 2nd trunk ?
On Sat, Jun 8, 2013 at 3:40 AM, Tom Storey <t...@snnap.net> wrote: > Depending on the hashing algoritm, it is still possible for one link to > run hotter than the other in a bundle. > > Just like it is possible for the right mix of customers to run one link > hotter than the other. > > Using a second trunk means that most customers will not experience any > interruption, only the customers whos configuration is moved from one GigE > to the other will experience a brief interruption. Using a bundle you would > need to interrupt all customers to implement it, however, it also provides > a level of redundancy if one GigE fails for some reason. > > A bundle also allows for capacity increases to be implemented quite easily > in the future too. > > All valid solutions with pro's and con's. :-) > > > On 7 June 2013 21:35, Ahmed Hilmy <hilmy...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hello Friends, >> >> I have a Cisco SW ( 3560 ) with one Trunk link to my router ( 7606 ), >> Trunk >> link is fully utilized so i need to add 2nd Trunk. >> Shall all move some customers from old trunk to 2nd one and create a new >> subterface for them ? >> >> I am think if i can create bundle and add subinterfaces under this bundle >> ? >> >> Add two GE ports to be memeber of this bundle ? >> >> Please advice >> >> Regards, >> Ahmed >> _______________________________________________ >> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp >> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ >> > > _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/