Thanks Paul - How many flows per second were you doing?

I'll certainly be trialling it.

Cheers.

> Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 14:42:28 -0400
> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] NetflowAuditor
> From: [email protected]
> To: [email protected]; [email protected]
> 
> Hey thereŠ.
> 
> We used it quite some time back and it was "ok".  Our issue with it was
> scaling - once we started to do 1:100 sampling across several routers it
> had a really difficult time keeping up.  The hardware we were using was
> "beefy" Š. Granted this was quite a while back when we were using GSR's
> 12012 and 12410 specificallyŠ.
> 
> Since, we bought some other packages and finally just went with Arbor -
> not cheap solution but works well for our needs...
> 
> Best advice I can think of would be to get a trial version and test it..
> 
> Cheers,
> Paul
> 
> 
> On 2013-06-19 6:42 PM, "John Elliot" <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> >Hi,
> >
> >Just wondering if anyone has used this product?
> >(http://netflowauditor.com/)
> >
> >Any comments/experiences are greatly appreciated.
> >
> >Thanks.                                       
> >_______________________________________________
> >cisco-nsp mailing list  [email protected]
> >https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> >archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> 
> 
                                          
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Reply via email to