What if I do 6vpe and don't use the "send-lable" ? what happens ?
Aaron From: Ahmed Hilmy [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2013 1:05 PM To: Aaron Cc: Mikael Abrahamsson; [email protected] Subject: Re: [c-nsp] IPv6 Deployment / 6PE Hello Aaron, Thanks for sharing info. Regarding to send-lable command, Cisco call it a magic command, to make PE router to advertise IPv6 prefix as a label. I am working on 6PE deployment. - PEs & IGW ----- MPBGP ----- RR - add adress-family ipv6 at PEs & RR ( active & send-label ) It will work On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 5:27 PM, Aaron <[email protected]> wrote: (I'm looking at my ios xr asr9k doing this and sending notes about how I did it, I didn't do the rr yet, but I understand this is how it's done on rr too) IGW.... - Vrf defined...enable ipv6 address family on this vrf... - Add internet interface to this vrf... - add ipv6 address to this internet interface - under bgp, under vrf, enable the appropriate ipv6 native type stuff for bgp neighboring, etc (JUST LIKE V4)...but I have no idea why you need send-label. - enable mpls on connection towards your internal mpls cloud (toward your rr) ...for 6vpe only v4 is needed on your internal net - on the internal side, enable mpibgp with address-family vpnv6 unicast from the igw to the rr on both sides and of course from rr to other internal pe's RR.... - I think the vpvn6 af for that mpibgp session towards igw and other internal pe's is all that is required on rr in order to support 6vpe other internal pe's... - Vrf defined...enable ipv6 address family on this vrf... - Add customer facing interface to this vrf... - add ipv6 address to this customer facing interface - under bgp, under vrf, enable the appropriate ipv6 native type stuff for customer facing pe-ce routing...but I have no idea why you need send-label. - enable mpls on connection towards your internal mpls cloud (toward your rr) ...for 6vpe only v4 is needed on your internal net - on the internal side, enable mpibgp with address-family vpnv6 unicast from the igw to the rr on both sides and of course from rr to other internal pe's Aaron -----Original Message----- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ahmed Hilmy Sent: Saturday, June 22, 2013 5:00 AM To: Mikael Abrahamsson Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [c-nsp] IPv6 Deployment / 6PE But i dont have MP-BGP between IGW & RR, I have pure BGP IPv4. So ? On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 12:05 PM, Mikael Abrahamsson <[email protected]>wrote: > On Sat, 22 Jun 2013, Ahmed Hilmy wrote: > > Can i add address family IPv6 at IGW to advertise IPv6 routes to RR, >> since it is directly connected ? >> > > Sure. I would configure send-label there as well so that you do thing > in a consistent manner, but that's a matter of opinion. > > > -- > Mikael Abrahamsson email: [email protected] > _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
