I have been looking over those drafts and like what I see thus far, makes perfect sense. Too bad it didn't exist 4 years ago. :)
Phil On 7/8/13 11:31 AM, "Saku Ytti" <[email protected]> wrote: >On (2013-07-08 17:14 +0200), Mark Tinka wrote: > >> We, at the time, opted to wait for IP LFA since RSVP-TE in >> the Access (even just to the adjacent PE routers) just >> didn't look administratively feasible, let alone scale :-). > >Even tLDP needed for rLFA is less than desirable, additional states >seemingly arbitrarily signalled up and down. Segment routing[0] provides >100% coverage for LFA like functionality without any additional signalling >between the devices. > >[0] >http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-filsfils-rtgwg-segment-routing-use-cases- >00#section-3 > >EFT program exists for IOS-XR/ASR9k at least. >-- > ++ytti >_______________________________________________ >cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] >https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp >archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
