Hi Yaswanth I haven’t made it in real life, but doesn’t seem difficult.
What I would do is publish the default route with a different community in each hub (i.e. 65000:1 in one hub and 65000:2). In each spoke, depending of what you want use the community to set a local preference. i.e. in the hub: router bgp 65000 network 0.0.0.0 mask 0.0.0.0 neighbor 10.0.0.2 remote-as 65000 neighbor 10.0.0.2 send—community neighbor 10.0.0.2 route-map NY out route-map NY permit 10 set community 65000:1 in the spoke: router bgp 65000 neighbor 10.0.0.1 remote-as 65000 neighbor 10.0.0.1 route-map hub in route-map hub permit 10 match community 65000:1 set local-preference 130 route-map hub permit 20 match community 65000:2 set local-preference 90 Regards, Fernando El 26/07/2013, a las 07:41, vasu varma <ypk...@gmail.com> escribió: > Hi Lumbis, > > Thanks for your response. > > Its not all about latency, latency may vary depending on the backbone > utilization irrespective of closest location. > > I want in such a way that east locations should prefer the default route > from East HUB with West HUB acting as secondary and west locations should > prefer the default route from WEST HUB with EAST HUB acting as secondary. > > One location may be equally destined in terms of latency or distance but we > should be able to configure as we desired. > > Regards > Yaswanth > > > On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 8:32 PM, Pete Lumbis <alum...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> If by "closest" you mean "lowest latency" you probably want to look at >> something like PfR to do this dynamically for you. >> >> >> On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 1:48 AM, vasu varma <ypk...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi Team, >>> >>> I have a requirement in such a way that there are two HUB's, one in >>> Newyork >>> and other in LOS Angeles. The spoke locations will access the HUB location >>> whichever is closer geographically and the other acts as the backup for >>> that particular site. >>> >>> If both the HUB's injects default route into the cloud, how can I >>> configure >>> the iBGP attributes to select the best path based on the closest physical >>> location. >>> >>> Our's is a MPLS cloud with multiple customers sharing the same Infra. >>> >>> Can someone assist me with the solution approach and most importantly the >>> changes that I need to do in my network. >>> >>> Regards >>> Yaswanth >>> _______________________________________________ >>> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net >>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp >>> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ >>> >> >> > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/