On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 09:49:06PM +1000, Andrew Miehs wrote: > On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 8:34 PM, CiscoNSP List > <cisconsp_l...@hotmail.com>wrote: > > > > > > > On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 06:58:17PM +1030, CiscoNSP List wrote: > > > > Have the following requirements: > > > > Fully redundant, dual power, dual supervisor, multiple line cards for > > > > redundancy > > > > > > How many ports of which types? > > > > > > Only a few gig-e ports. > > > > > In that case, you may even be okay with a ASR1001 - they are much > cheaper...
ASR1001 has no redundancy except power. Deploying a pair of ASR1001 might be an option, depending on the integration scenario and would provide higher availability and fault isolation than a fully redundant system. Best regards, Daniel -- CLUE-RIPE -- Jabber: d...@cluenet.de -- dr@IRCnet -- PGP: 0xA85C8AA0 _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/