it won't be doing much v6 for now. i imagine that by the time the volume
is high enough, i'll be able to upgrade to a better sup. will the 720 do
hardware ipv6 forwarding? as usual, the ipv6 stuff i found at cisco
about the 6500 didn't mention anything about hardware support being
slightly different.

On 09/16/2013 04:43 PM, Blake Dunlap wrote:
> You realize that sup will not do ip6 in hardware right?
>
> -Blake
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 6:31 PM, Joe Pruett <[email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>
>     trying to bring ipv6 to an older 6509 system (sup2/msfc2). it
>     currently
>     runs 12.1. 12.2 has v6 in it, but the image is too big to go into
>     bootflash. so i grabbed some pcmcia cards and dropped the image on
>     there. so far so good, but the failover sup2 has too old of a
>     rommon on
>     it (6.1(4)) and can't see disk0. luckily that is new enough that
>     it can
>     have new rommon flashed, but the 12.2 images i can get don't support
>     disk0 either, which seems very odd to me. so i think that maybe it
>     needs
>     a boot loader. but even worse is that the 12.2 rommon thinks that
>     bootflash is corrupt. i even tried xmodem'ing the boot image over, but
>     as usually happens with xmodem, i never got it to fly.
>
>     so, i'm hoping someone here can provide one of the following:
>
>     1. old 7.1 rommon image i can flash
>     2. clue about why the newest 12.2 rommon doesn't see disk0 as a
>     dev, and
>     thinks bootflash is corrupt
>     3. a way to get cisco to stop making things so complicated :-)
>     _______________________________________________
>     cisco-nsp mailing list  [email protected]
>     <mailto:[email protected]>
>     https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>     archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
>

_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Reply via email to